This week's news on Julian Assange.
-
Never forget that Bradley Manning, and not gay marriage, is the issue
17 MayNew Statesman
Barack Obama’s sudden “conversion” to the cause of same-sex marriage barely disguises the prime motives of a president as reactionary and violent as George W Bush.In the week Barack Obama received the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009, he ordered bombing attacks on Yemen, killing a reported 63 people, 28 of them children. When recently Obama announced that he supported same-sex marriage, Nato planes had not long blown 14 Afghan civilians to bits. In both cases, the mass murder was barely news. What mattered were the cynical vacuities of a political celebrity, the product of a zeitgeist driven by the forces of consumerism and the media, with the aim of diverting the struggle for social and economic justice.
The award of the Nobel Prize to the first black American president because he “offered hope” was both absurd and an authentic expression of the lifestyle liberalism that controls much political debate in the west. Same-sex marriage is one such distraction. No “issue” diverts attention as successfully as this: not the free vote in parliament on lowering the age of gay consent promoted by that noted libertarian and war criminal, Tony Blair; not the cracks in “glass ceilings” that contribute nothing to women’s liberation and merely amplify the demands of bourgeois privilege.
Groupie surge
Legal obstacles should not prevent people from marrying each other, regardless of gender. However, this is a civil and private matter; bourgeois acceptability is not yet a human right. The rights historically associated with marriage are those of property – capitalism itself. Elevating the “right” to marriage above the right to life and justice is as profane as seeking allies among those who deny life and justice to so many, from Afghanistan to Palestine.
On 9 May, hours before his Damascene declaration on same-sex marriage, Obama sent out messages to potential donors making his new position clear. He asked for money. In response, according to the Washington Post, his campaign received a “massive surge of contributions”. The following evening, with the news now dominated by his “conversion”, he attended a fundraising party at the Los Angeles home of the actor George Clooney.
“Hollywood,” reported the Associated Press, “is home to some of the most high-profile backers of gay marriage, and the 150 donors who are paying $40,000 to attend Clooney’s dinner will no doubt feel invigorated by Obama’s watershed announcement the day before.” The Clooney party is expected to raise a record $15m for Obama’s re-election. It was followed by “yet another fundraiser Monday in New York sponsored by gay and Latino Obama supporters”.
On economic and foreign policies, the width of a cigarette paper separates the Democratic Party from the Republicans. Both represent the super-rich and the impoverishment of a nation from which trillions of tax dollars have been transferred to a permanent war industry and banks that are little more than criminal enterprises. Obama is as reactionary and violent as George W Bush, and in some ways he is worse. His speciality is the use of drones armed with Hellfire missiles against defenceless people.
Under cover of a partial withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan, he has sent US special forces to 120 countries where death squads are trained. He has revived the old cold war on two fronts: against China in Asia and with a “shield” of missiles aimed at Russia. The first black American president has presided over the incarceration and surveillance of greater numbers of black people than were enslaved in 1850. He has prosecuted more whistleblowers – truth-tellers – than any of his predecessors. His vice-president, Joe Biden, a zealous warmonger, has called the WikiLeaks editor Julian Assange a “hi-tech terrorist”. Biden has also converted to the cause of gay marriage.
One of America’s true heroes is the gay soldier Bradley Manning, the whistleblower alleged to have provided WikiLeaks with the epic evidence of US carnage in Iraq and Afghanistan. It was the Obama administration that smeared his homosexuality as weird, and it was Obama who declared a man convicted of no crime to be guilty.
Who among the fawners and the luvvies at Clooney’s Hollywood moneyfest shouted, “Remember Bradley Manning”? To my knowledge, no prominent spokesperson for gay rights has spoken out against Obama’s and Biden’s hypocrisy in claiming to support same-sex marriage while terrorising a gay man whose courage should be an inspiration to all, regardless of sexual preference.
Classy service
Obama’s historic achievement as president of the United States has been to silence the anti-war and social justice movement associated with the Democratic Party. Such deference to an extremism disguised by and embodied in a clever, amoral operator betrays the rich tradition of popular protest in the US. Perhaps the Occupy movement is in this tradition; perhaps not.
The truth is that what matters to those who aspire to control our lives is not skin pigment, or gender, or whether or not we are gay, but the class we serve. The goals are to ensure that we look inward on ourselves, not outward to others, that we never comprehend the sheer scale of undemocratic power, and that we collaborate in isolating those who resist. This attrition of criminalising, brutalising and banning protest can easily turn western democracies into states of fear.
On 12 May, in Sydney, Australia, home of the Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras, a protest parade in support of gay marriage filled the city centre. The police looked on benignly. It was a showcase of liberalism. Three days later, there was to be a march to commemorate al-Naqba (“the Catastrophe”), the day of mourning marking Israel’s expulsion of the Palestinians from their land. A police ban had to be overturned by the Supreme Court.
That is why the people of Greece ought to be our inspiration. By their own painful experience, they know that their freedom can only be regained by standing up to the German central bank, the International Monetary Fund and their own quislings in Athens. People across Latin America have achieved this: the indignados of Bolivia, who saw off the water privateers, and the Argentinians, who told the IMF what to do with their debt. The courage of disobedience was their weapon. Remember Bradley Manning.
-
Wikileaks May Have Led To Execution Of Convicted Assassin
16 MayWebProNews
Surely you recall the massive diplomatic cable leaks that Wikileaks spearheaded a few years ago. It was a massive event that had everybody from all sides calling Julian Assange a traitor (even though he’s not even a U.S. citizen) and calling for his execution. They claimed that the leaks put foreign diplomats and those working for the U.S. overseas at risk.
Let’s back up a little bit now. You may remember back in 2010 that an Iranian nuclear scientist, Masoud Ali-Mohammadi, was assassinated. A man by the name of Majid Jamali Fashi, a kick-boxer, was arrested and charged with the murder. The Iranian government claimed that he was acting on behalf of Israel. He was recently hanged for his supposed crime Tuesday.
These two stories seem to have nothing in common. One was a leak of diplomatic cables while the other was a man accused of assassination. The Times of Israel figures that it goes much deeper than that. They quote a story from The Times (paywall) that found the cable leaks contained a document that pointed an unnamed man that matched Fashi down to the fact that he was trained in martial arts. These documents were released a few days before the arrest of Fashi.
The timing does indeed work out and the leaked cable does point to a man that Fashi fit the description of. Do I believe that the leaks had anything to do with his capture? It’s hard to tell at this point and probably will be for a long time. Iran is really secretive about their court trials while they spoke for Fashi saying that he admitted to working for Israel.
A country like Iran will do anything to get their man. This is the country that will stoop to creating their own Internet just to keep its people away from any information that’s critical of the country’s leadership. I wouldn’t put it past the Iranian authorities to arrest some guy and make him admit to these crimes just to get their guy. They, like North Korea, like to make accusatory statements and blame all of their failings on anybody else but themselves.
It all comes down to what you think of Wikileaks. If you were one of the people crying out for Assange to be executed for treason, then you’ll likely believe that Wikileaks led to the death of a potentially innocent man. If you think that Wikileaks can do no wrong, then you probably think that this is all just a big coincidence.
It’s too hard to tell right now, but it does spin a cautionary tale about the risks of leaking confidential information. In today’s open world, information should be free. Wikileaks and its ilk more often than not help keep government’s accountable through this information sharing. There are risks involved, of course, but does the risk outweigh the potential failings of government being kept hidden?
-
Takedown Of The Day
11 MayThe Daily Dish - By Andrew Sullivan
Pareene tackles Jonah Goldberg:
Goldberg is always careful never to actually stake out a controversial position on anything. He’ll never buck the movement, but he sees himself as above the right-wing populists. His position on any number of issues is impossible to discern. On gay marriage: "I have always felt that gay marriage was an inevitability, for good or ill (most likely both)." Jonah defended waterboarding while also claiming to find it a "tough question" and complaining that supporters of waterboarding were unfairly tarred as "pro-torture."
Everything he writes for publication is littered with "to be sure" ass-covering and declarations that he’s not actually seriously arguing what it seems very much like he’s arguing. (The Supreme Court’s Fred Phelps ruling was deplorable but also probably correct but maybe not. Julian Assange should be assassinated not that I’m saying for real that he should be assassinated.) He’s too cowardly and insecure to allow himself to be pinned down on most divisive political issues, much preferring to devote pixels and ink to making fun of mythical sandal-wearing Prius-driving (formerly Volvo-driving) liberals who supposedly think things he finds silly. Or Barbra Streisand, a recurring figure in his oeuvre.
